Watch the full video:
Introduction: Contradiction at the Heart of Policy
The government insists it is “cutting red tape” to help British businesses thrive. Yet, as BlackBeltBarrister reveals, the same ministers are imposing new restrictions that make life harder for employers, retailers, and consumers alike. These conflicting measures show that policymakers appear to have absolutely no clue how real businesses operate.
Financial Deregulation and Dangerous Amnesia
After the 2008 global financial crash, Britain tightened financial regulations to prevent a repeat collapse. Now, Labour’s shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves has promised to “sweep away red tape” in the finance sector — undoing much of that post-crisis oversight. While presented as a boost to home ownership, the risk is that removing these checks could trigger the same instability that caused the crash in the first place.
Licensing and Public Oversight Removed
Another proposed change would scrap the requirement to publish alcohol licensing applications in local newspapers. That means new pubs, nightclubs, or venue extensions could appear without residents ever being informed. Communities lose transparency, while local objections become practically impossible.
Rising Costs and Business Closures
Meanwhile, restaurants and hospitality businesses are struggling with soaring costs. Pizza Hut recently announced the closure of 68 restaurants, cutting over 1,200 jobs due to high operating and staffing costs. For an industry already under pressure, tax obligations and rising wages are making expansion unsustainable — and “cutting red tape” offers little relief.
New Red Tape: Advertising and Food Restrictions
At the same time, the government has introduced new regulations banning promotions on food and drink it deems “unhealthy”. Retailers are now prohibited from offering free refills or “buy one, get one free” deals on sugary drinks, sweets, crisps, and similar items. Pubs such as Wetherspoons and restaurants like Nando’s have stopped offering unlimited soft drink refills.
These measures are designed to reduce sugar intake, but as Daniel points out, they will mostly increase food costs. Those who still buy these items will simply pay more, further fuelling food inflation now above 5%.
Environmental Rules and Planning Loopholes
The government is also rewriting environmental protections, claiming that they “hold up development.” In practice, this could open large sections of greenbelt land for construction despite local opposition. Once again, deregulation risks benefitting big developers while harming communities and countryside.
Regulations Exist for a Reason
Financial, environmental, and consumer regulations were introduced for public protection — to prevent market collapse, protect the environment, and ensure informed communities. Dismantling these safeguards under the guise of “cutting red tape” risks trading stability for short-term political gain.
Conclusion: Policy Without Principle
Governments cannot claim to champion business freedom while simultaneously strangling trade with contradictory legislation. From hospitality to finance, this confused approach shows a fundamental lack of understanding of how the UK economy truly works.
Watch the full discussion here: https://youtu.be/qXfkhk3Cam0
Keywords: BlackBeltBarrister, UK law, business regulation, red tape, Labour government, Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves, food advertising ban, financial deregulation, small business, UK economy